It has just been announced that the NSW Par­lia­ment is con­sid­er­ing reforms to the Stra­ta Schemes Man­age­ment Act 2015 (SSMA) to remove the need for face-to-face meet­ings and allow own­ers cor­po­ra­tions to oper­ate elec­tron­i­cal­ly. In the mean­time, own­ers cor­po­ra­tions are still required com­ply with their oblig­a­tions to hold meet­ings in com­pli­ance with the SSMA.

Under the Stra­ta Schemes Man­age­ment Reg­u­la­tion 2016, there are two meth­ods in which an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion can vote by oth­er means:

  • by elec­tron­ic means from a remote loca­tion ie tele­con­fer­ence, video-con­fer­ence and email; and
  • by email, bal­lot paper or oth­er elec­tron­ic means before the meet­ing (pre-meet­ing elec­tron­ic voting).
  • a scheme with 20 lots or less, one,
  • a scheme with more than 20 lots, not more than 5% of the total num­ber of lots.

In order for the own­ers cor­po­ra­tion to vote by oth­er means’ (under Clause 14 of the Stra­ta Schemes Man­age­ment Reg­u­la­tion 2016 (Clause 14′)) a res­o­lu­tion must be passed at a gen­er­al meet­ing in person.

Under clause 28 of Sched­ule 1 of the SSMA, a vote at a meet­ing by a per­son enti­tled to vote or by a proxy must be cast in per­son unless the own­ers cor­po­ra­tion, by res­o­lu­tion passed at a gen­er­al meet­ing, deter­mines that a vote may be cast by some oth­er spec­i­fied means. 

Note, under Clause 14 sub­sec­tion 1(b), pre-meet­ing elec­tron­ic vot­ing can­not occur when elec­tions are to be deter­mined at the meeting. 

What to do if no res­o­lu­tion for elec­tron­ic meet­ing has been passed

If the own­ers cor­po­ra­tion have not passed a res­o­lu­tion for elec­tron­ic vot­ing there is a way to reduce the amount of peo­ple in atten­dance at a gen­er­al meet­ing by appoint­ing prox­ies (not­ing that there is a lim­i­ta­tion on the num­ber of prox­ies that may be held).

The total num­ber of prox­ies that may be held by a per­son are as follows:

To achieve quo­rum at the meet­ing (pur­suant to clause 17(2)(a) of Sched­ule 1 of the SSMA), there must be not less than one-quar­ter of the per­sons present.

If quo­rum is not achieved, please note that the chair­per­son under clause 17(4) of Sched­ule 1 of the SSMA may declare after half an hour that the per­sons present either per­son­al­ly or by duly appoint­ed proxy and are enti­tled to vote on the motion or elec­tion con­sti­tute a quo­rum for con­sid­er­ing that motion or business…’.

Please note that this is not legal advice. If you require inde­pen­dent legal advice as to your stra­ta scheme please con­tact us.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

The Work­place Vac­cine Man­date Myth Buster Case

In the recent Fair Work Com­mis­sion deci­sion of Eileen Owens v I‑Med Radi­ol­o­gy Ltd [2022] FWC 1823, an inter­locu­to­ry judg­ment con­sid­er­ing…

The Omi­cron Work­place Safe­ty Dilemma

The Omi­cron vari­ant has, in a mat­ter of weeks, trans­formed the COVID-19 sit­u­a­tion in the east­ern states of Aus­tralia. In New…

Covid-19 Vac­ci­na­tions for chil­dren – What hap­pens if you and the oth­er par­ent can­not agree?

As NSW hits the 70% vac­ci­na­tion mark and we get clos­er to return­ing to the life we knew before the…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Sack­ing over anti-vaxxer protest at CFMEU HQ jus­ti­fied” — pub­lished in the Aus­tralian Finan­cial Review on 6 Jan­u­ary 2022

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Sack­ing over anti-vaxxer protest at CFMEU HQ jus­ti­fied”, pub­lished in the Aus­tralian Finan­cial…

Con­struc­tion Sites to Return to Full Capac­i­ty from 27 Sep­tem­ber 2021

Con­struc­tion Sites to Return to Full Capac­i­ty from 27 Sep­tem­ber 2021  Since 19 July 2021, NSW Con­struc­tion sites have either been…

Retail and Oth­er Com­mer­cial Leas­es (COVID-19) Amend­ment Reg­u­la­tion 2021

Vic­to­ria has passed enabling leg­is­la­tion for anoth­er rent relief scheme for retail and com­mer­cial ten­ants. How­ev­er, the spe­cif­ic details about…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information